Alternatives to polynomial trend-corrected differences-in-differences models

Vincent Vandenberghe

Applied Economics Letters, 2019, vol. 26, issue 5, 358-361

Abstract: A common problem with differences-in-differences (DD) estimates is the failure of the parallel-trend assumption. To cope with this, most authors include polynomial (linear, quadratic…) trends among the regressors, and estimate the treatment effect as a once-in-a-time trend shift. In practice, that strategy does not work very well, because inter alia the estimation of the trend uses post-treatment data. An extreme case is when sample covers only one period before treatment and many after. Then the trend’s estimate relies almost completely on post-treatment developments, and absorbs most of the treatment effect. What is needed is a method that i) uses pretreatment observations to capture linear or nonlinear trend differences, and ii) extrapolates these to compute the treatment effect. This article shows how this can be achieved using a fully flexible version of the canonical DD equation. It also contains an illustration using data on a 1994–2000 EU programme that was implemented in the Belgian province of Hainaut.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2018.1478386 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Alternatives to Polynomial Trend-Corrected Differences-In-Differences Models (2018)
Working Paper: Alternatives to Polynomial Trend-Corrected Differences-In-Differences Models (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:358-361

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2018.1478386

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().