Unintended look-ahead bias in out-of-sample forecasting

James Yae

Applied Economics Letters, 2024, vol. 31, issue 10, 953-957

Abstract: This article shows that out-of-sample tests are susceptible to look-ahead bias not only to multiple testing problem that is emphasized in the literature. A forecaster often constructs a well-performing model without trial and error but with an intuition that is derived from observed empirical patterns in the test sample. Such an intuition, however, is unavailable in the beginning of the test sample. Therefore, the reported forecasting performance in an out-of-sample test is possibly exaggerated, although a forecaster simply utilizes her expertise without any intended p-hacking or fishing. A stylized forecasting model with an example of stock market return predictability quantitatively demonstrates this unintended look-ahead bias in out-of-sample tests.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2022.2159002 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:10:p:953-957

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2159002

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().