EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The lower the better? Revisiting minimum tick size

Roland Mestel, Erik Theissen and Corinna Uhlenkamp

Applied Economics Letters, 2025, vol. 32, issue 17, 2460-2465

Abstract: We analyse the impact on liquidity of a reduction of the minimum tick size to sub-cent levels at the Vienna Stock Exchange. We find no effect, even after controlling for the extent to which stocks were constrained by the pre-change tick size. Our results imply that regulator-imposed lower bounds on the tick size are not necessarily harmful, and they fail to confirm the existence of a u-shaped relation between tick size and illiquidity as predicted by theoretical models.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2024.2333996 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:17:p:2460-2465

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2024.2333996

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-11-05
Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:17:p:2460-2465