Economics at your fingertips  

Arbitration versus negotiation: the risk aversion of players

David Frederick, William Kaempfer (), Martin Ross and Richard Wobbekind

Applied Economics Letters, 1998, vol. 5, issue 3, 187-190

Abstract: This paper explores the effects that skill and experience have on a baseball player's decision about whether to negotiate with his team or to enter into arbitration. The action taken by players who are eligible to file depends on their perceived trade-off between various types of risk such as the possibility of injury and the risks inherent in the arbitration process. Experience increases the chance that a player will go through arbitration, a high skill level decreases that chance, and a large spread between offered and desired salaries makes a negotiated solution more likely.

Date: 1998
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1080/758521379

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

Page updated 2020-03-29
Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:5:y:1998:i:3:p:187-190