 Short positions, size effect, and the liquidity hypothesis: implications for stock performanceSaid Elfakhani Applied Financial Economics, 2000, vol. 10, issue 1, 105-116 Abstract: This study focuses on the relationship between short interest and subsequent stock returns. It also deals with the question of whether this relationship itself is attributable to firm size. In this context, this study investigates: (1) whether short sellers are correct in their predictions and whether these predictions can benefit other investors, (2) whether returns on short positions are related to firm size, and (3) whether the liquidity hypothesis or the differential information hypothesis can explain the relationship between firm size and short selling. The results support the notion that short sellers made correct predictions of price movements during the sampling period, 1986-1990. The results also show that following the monthly report of short interests, investors can still earn higher returns on shorted stocks, especially the small ones. Finally, the results maintain that short interest positions on less-liquid overpriced small stocks are more profitable than more-liquid overpriced large stocks, thus supporting the liquidity hypothesis. Overall these findings do not display seasonal differences, especially in January. Date: 2000 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:10:y:2000:i:1:p:105-116 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Applied Financial Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips More articles in Applied Financial Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.