Product liability litigation: an issue of Merck and lawsuits over Vioxx
Kurt Rotthoff
Applied Financial Economics, 2010, vol. 20, issue 24, 1867-1878
Abstract:
Merck & Co., Inc. pulled Vioxx, a $2.5 billon a year nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, off the shelf in September 2004. The removal followed a study that was published reporting Vioxx increased the risk of Cardiovascular Events (CE) after long-term use. In the years since then, many lawsuits have been filed against Merck. This article examines the incentive to recall a product and the effects of Merck pulling Vioxx from the shelves. Using the market's expected Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for Merck, I calculate the expected profits from future Vioxx sales. I then use data on financial effects to show how the Market Value (MV) of Merck reflects their probability of winning legal cases concerning Vioxx.
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603107.2010.526571 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:20:y:2010:i:24:p:1867-1878
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20
DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2010.526571
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Financial Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips
More articles in Applied Financial Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().