Is the stock market efficient in bad times and inefficient in good times?
Yacine Hammami ()
Applied Financial Economics, 2011, vol. 21, issue 12, 905-915
Abstract:
This article examines the cross sectional predictability of stock returns within the framework of time varying risk premia and asymmetric risk. In bad times, small, value and cyclical stocks are riskier than big, growth and noncyclical stocks, thereby explaining the value, size and cyclical premia. In contrast, in good times, value, big and noncyclical stocks generate higher average returns than do growth, small and cyclical stocks, despite the fact that they are not riskier. Furthermore, empirical tests of macroeconomic models highlight that average returns are commensurate with risk only in bad times. These results are robust to different measures of risk and different sets of test assets.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603107.2010.539536 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:21:y:2011:i:12:p:905-915
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20
DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2010.539536
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Financial Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips
More articles in Applied Financial Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().