Dead man walking: an empirical reassessment of the deterrent effect of capital punishment using the bounds testing approach to cointegration
Paresh Narayan () and
Russell Smyth
Applied Economics, 2006, vol. 38, issue 17, 1975-1989
Abstract:
This paper empirically estimates a murder supply equation for the United States from 1965 to 2001 within a cointegration and error correction framework. Our findings suggest that any support for the deterrence hypothesis is sensitive to the inclusion of variables for the effects of guns and other crimes. In the long run we find that real income and the conditional probability of receiving the death sentence are the main factors explaining variations in the homicide rate. In the short run the aggravated assault rate and robbery rate are the most important determinants of the homicide rate.
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036840500427288 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Dead Man Walking: An Empirical Reassessment of the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment Using the Bounds Testing Approach to Cointegration (2004) 
Working Paper: Dead Man Walking: An Empirical Reassessment of the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment Using the Bounds Testing Approach to Cointegration 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:applec:v:38:y:2006:i:17:p:1975-1989
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEC20
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500427288
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips
More articles in Applied Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().