A study of credit risk of Chinese listed companies: ZPP versus KMV
Lili Li,
Jun Yang and
Xin Zou
Applied Economics, 2016, vol. 48, issue 29, 2697-2710
Abstract:
The Zero-Price Probability (ZPP) model is applied to evaluate the credit risk of listed companies in China and its performance is compared to that of the Kealhofer-McQuown-Vasicek (KMV) model. The sample includes 34 financially distressed companies and a comparison group of 34 financially healthy companies. The performances of ZPP and KMV models are compared using various descriptive statistics and statistical tests. The empirical analyses show that the ZPP model is superior to the KMV model in terms of discriminatory power. Compared to the KMV model, the ZPP model performs much better in distinguishing between financially challenged and healthy firms. Among different specifications of the ZPP model, the naïve constant variance zero-price probability model outperforms those with generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity specifications. This article is among the very first studies that provide evidence on the performance of the ZPP model.
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2015.1128077 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:applec:v:48:y:2016:i:29:p:2697-2710
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEC20
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1128077
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips
More articles in Applied Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().