The random walk as a forecasting benchmark: drift or no drift?

Imad Moosa and Kelly Burns

Applied Economics, 2016, vol. 48, issue 43, 4131-4142

Abstract: We examine the proposition that the random walk without drift is more powerful in predicting exchange rates than the random walk with drift. It is demonstrated that there is no theoretical reason why the random walk without drift always outperforms the random walk with drift and that this is an empirical issue. The results show that while the random walk without drift can outperform the random walk with drift in terms of the RMSE, it fails to do so in terms of the ability to predict the direction of change, measures that take into account magnitude and direction, and in terms of profitability. If the drift factor is allowed to change over time by estimating the model in time-varying parameter terms, the random walk with drift performs even better.

Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2016.1153788 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:applec:v:48:y:2016:i:43:p:4131-4142

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEC20

DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1153788

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().