The adviser effect on insurance disclosures
Demetris Christodoulou and
Doron Samuell
Applied Economics, 2020, vol. 52, issue 5, 519-527
Abstract:
An examination of personal and medical disclosures made by retail customers to a commercial life insurer reveals that customers screened for insurance with the assistance of a financial adviser considerably under-disclose by comparison to when screened by the insurer. The pattern of under-disclosure is consistent across all areas. We also find that adviser-screened customers are far more likely to be offered standard terms especially for smokers, whereas insurer-screened customers are more likely to be offered modified terms or be declined insurance. We argue that the adviser, who receives a commission when a contract is accepted, may be motivated to influence disclosures in order to increase the chance of an accepted contract in affordable terms and therefore maximize own returns. By doing so, the adviser exposes the customer to legal remedies whereby the insurance company may cancel the contract or refuse a claim. Our results support the findings of various enquiries that call for an end to commission-based sales.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2019.1646883 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:5:p:519-527
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEC20
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1646883
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips
More articles in Applied Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().