Storm in a teacup: Empire products, blended teas, and origin marking debates in 1920s Britain

David M. Higgins and Aashish Velkar

Business History, 2025, vol. 67, issue 4, 1141-1164

Abstract: This article uses the origin marking of tea as a case study to examine contemporary debates on imperial preference and ‘soft’ trade protection. The case integrates three themes affecting the UK business environment during the 1920s: protectionism, imperial tariff preference, and consumer choice. We discuss the extent to which consumers’ tea purchases were influenced by proprietary brand, or geographical origin. Our analysis focuses on the legislative framework provided by the Merchandise Marks Act, 1926, mandating origin marking for specific imported foodstuffs. Contrary to the established view, we demonstrate how product quality in the supply chain of tea consumed in the UK was determined not by the producers (tea growers), but by the major UK-based blenders. We argue that UK consumers were unable to exercise any meaningful voluntary preference for empire teas. Our article reveals that the political idea of an ‘empire product’ did not always translate well into commercial reality.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2024.2313519 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:4:p:1141-1164

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/FBSH20

DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2024.2313519

Access Statistics for this article

Business History is currently edited by Professor John Wilson and Professor Steven Toms

More articles in Business History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().