Trade-offs and prisoner of war policy under renewed great power tension

Spencer L. Willardson

Defense & Security Analysis, 2024, vol. 40, issue 4, 559-575

Abstract: Prisoners of War are a fact of war and must be accounted for legally, operationally, and strategically. The recent wars fought by the US have been characterised by detainee operations for combatants without soldier status. This article outlines the issues of detention and POWs to highlight the importance of this issue as a potential factor in winning armed conflict. The argument is that the US strategy is pivoting to competition, and preparation for potential war with China. As such, POW considerations need to be part of strategic and military planning. While the US has a robust doctrine for planning for POW operations under the laws of war, the US has historically struggled to exploit effectively and advantageously POWs for victory. Common trade-offs and considerations associated with detention policy are outlined. The article concludes with a call to make detention operations, with all that entails, part of the strategic conversation regarding great power competition.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2024.2407664 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:40:y:2024:i:4:p:559-575

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CDAN20

DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2024.2407664

Access Statistics for this article

Defense & Security Analysis is currently edited by Martin Edmonds

More articles in Defense & Security Analysis from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().