The Borders of Orientalism: “Europeanization” in Hungary and Ukraine
Melinda Kovács and
Olena Leipnik
Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 2008, vol. 16, issue 2, 151-169
Abstract:
In recent English-language social science, “Europeanization” has been used to refer to institutional transformation and it has also been treated as synonymous with processes related to the EU. The mainstream of the relevant literature does not distinguish between “Europeanization” as a process and “Europeanization” as a concept. The institutional/practical and the mythical/ideological dimensions of “Europeanization” are conflated in politics, which provides people with a social myth and a powerful tool for manipulation. We distinguish the two dimensions of “Europeanization” and use the cases of Ukraine and Hungary to illustrate that the concept of “Europeanization” becoming a myth may hinder the process or exist without the real process, thereby creating a simulacrum of “Europe”. We also show that advancing in the process (e.g. achieving EU membership) does not change the dynamics of the concept (Orientalism and its self-imposed varieties).
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09651560802316949 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:151-169
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cdeb20
DOI: 10.1080/09651560802316949
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe is currently edited by Andrew Kilmister
More articles in Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().