Monitoring and evaluating advocacy: lessons from Oxfam GB's Climate Change campaign
Simon Starling
Development in Practice, 2010, vol. 20, issue 2, 277-286
Abstract:
This article examines Oxfam GB's learning from its attempts to improve monitoring and evaluation (M&E) processes within a global advocacy campaign. It outlines the Climate Change campaign team's practical experience of piloting different approaches to M&E, and the lessons emerging from the process. The experience suggests that while some ‘traditional’ elements of M&E are helpful in advocacy work, a greater focus on light, real-time monitoring systems is necessary. The findings highlight the organisational as well as methodological challenges of integrating M&E into advocacy campaigns: without a culture that rewards reflection and learning, improvements in staff capacities or data-collection systems will not be sustained. Indeed, the process of improving M&E practice mirrors that of an advocacy campaign itself, requiring analysis of power relations, opportunities, and constraints; monitoring of progress; and adapting plans on the basis of on-going learning. Finally, the article suggests possible ways forward, based on experience.
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614520903564215 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:20:y:2010:i:2:p:277-286
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cdip20
DOI: 10.1080/09614520903564215
Access Statistics for this article
Development in Practice is currently edited by Emily Finlay
More articles in Development in Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().