Public acceptance and perceptions of alternative water sources: a comparative study in nine locations
Anna Hurlimann and
Sara Dolnicar
International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2016, vol. 32, issue 4, 650-673
Abstract:
Public acceptance of recycled water, desalinated water and rainwater is compared across nine international locations: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, Norway and United States (specifically in Los Angeles). An online study was conducted in 2012, with 200 participants recruited to be representative of their respective location (1800 in total). The study investigated participants’ intended use of and perceptions of alternative water sources. Results indicate that respondents clearly differentiate between alternative water sources. Water source preference varied between water use purposes. Significant differences were found between locations in the percentage of respondents willing to use alternative water sources. Additionally the study found significant differences across locations in perceptions held of five water sources.
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07900627.2016.1143350 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cijwxx:v:32:y:2016:i:4:p:650-673
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cijw20
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1143350
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Water Resources Development is currently edited by Cecilia Tortajada
More articles in International Journal of Water Resources Development from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().