What defines success when visions compete: lessons from post-Katrina New Orleans
Terry van Dijk and
Gerd Weitkamp
International Planning Studies, 2017, vol. 22, issue 4, 350-365
Abstract:
Visions can be valuable tools for guiding and uniting land use interests in a region with fragmented administration. What determines the strength of a vision and how can it effectively play its role? Our study tested and supplemented hypotheses on the success factors of visions. We chose a city in a rebuilding process because that represents a most intensive and pressing vision process. We interviewed local policy-makers, designers, researchers, and journalists to find out what they would spontaneously cite as a vision’s most crucial factors. We also reviewed the subsequent New Orleans recovery plans and compared our findings with hypotheses from visioning literature. The interviewees’ spontaneous answers largely confirm the key hypotheses about success from the visioning literature. However, the most frequently mentioned factors were not in the literature: a vision needs to be propagated by a powerful authority, a favourable larger political climate, and the funds to sustain the implementation process. For a vision to make a difference, it needs to be substantively relevant and persuasive but also have a favourable institutional climate to help it along.
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2017.1296350 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:350-365
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cips20
DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2017.1296350
Access Statistics for this article
International Planning Studies is currently edited by Shin Lee, Scott Orford and Francesca Sartorio
More articles in International Planning Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().