Local planning cultures? What Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto planners say
John T. Jackson
International Planning Studies, 2022, vol. 27, issue 3, 284-301
Abstract:
This paper centres on what 51 planning practitioners working across the metropolises of Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto said in open-ended interviews about themselves and their work under current neoliberal policy settings. Planning systems were redesigned under these settings to attract inward investment more readily, local planners’ practices to be compliant. Through an interrogation of interview transcripts, the aim here to discern whether older professional values underlie current practices and what degree of influence, if any, they have. It is concluded they do, albeit in limited ways, their influence on planning practices varying between and within the three metropolises. Reasons why are discussed.
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2022.2043148 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:27:y:2022:i:3:p:284-301
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cips20
DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2022.2043148
Access Statistics for this article
International Planning Studies is currently edited by Shin Lee, Scott Orford and Francesca Sartorio
More articles in International Planning Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().