Boring cities

Bradley Garrett, Maria de Lourdes Melo Zurita and Kurt Iveson

City, 2020, vol. 24, issue 1-2, 276-285

Abstract: Most of the world’s major cities are now undergirded by complicated subterranean infrastructures; buried communication networks, water and waste management systems, storage vaults, transportation corridors, and even underground housing. In the past, only states, backed by tax revenue, could afford to undertake the boring and excavation required to build such spaces. Today however, the private sector seeks to profit from building, maintaining, and owning urban undergrounds. In this article, we traverse five underground assets in five cities—Sydney, Mexico City, Singapore, Los Angeles and Beijing—to query the political implications of underground privatisation. In allowing municipal underground infrastructure built for public provision slip into the hands of individuals and corporations, we suggest that the boring taking place under cities is far from boring, it’s the next chapter of neoliberalism, where we hand over control of the critical infrastructure that makes urban life possible.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2020.1739455 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:24:y:2020:i:1-2:p:276-285

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CCIT20

DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1739455

Access Statistics for this article

City is currently edited by Bob Catterall

More articles in City from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().