Namibian‐De Beers state‐firm relations: cooperation and conflict

Daniel Kempton and Roni Du Preez

Journal of Southern African Studies, 1997, vol. 23, issue 4, 585-613

Abstract: This article argues that state‐firm relations are an increasingly important fact of international relations. Using a version of the obsolescing bargain model, it empirically examines the relations between Namibia and De Beers, particularly the bargaining that has occurred since independence. The authors conclude that Namibian independence markedly altered both the bargaining power and interests of the two sides. Independence gave Namibia the ability to create more effective legislation and economic structures to limit and guide its domestic diamond industry. At the same time changes in the international diamond world, particularly the growing challenge from Russia, weakened De Beers’ bargaining power and increased its need to solidify its African base. Once Swapo became the government, its interests also changed markedly. Before independence Swapo viewed the mining of its diamonds as an unmitigated form of exploitation by De Beers. After independence it needed De Beers’ technology, investments and access to international markets to provide the state with export revenues and its people with salaries. The changes in bargaining power and interests have brought about numerous, subtle, but still significant, changes in Namibian‐De Beers relations. While the 1994 Namibian‐De Beers agreement provided the most visible evidence of this change, as predicted by the obsolescing bargain model, the terms of the relationship have continued to evolve. To support these conclusions the authors found evidence of change in each of five major issue areas: ownership, marketing, revenues, employment and production. For now it means that the principal objective of Namibian diplomacy in the 1990s is going to be the promotion, through our missions abroad and by all other means, of economic development of the country. It also means identifying and going after sources of investment, trade, soft loans and joint ventures on the basis of marketable, positive development and opportunities being created in Namibia for both the local and private sectors.Foreign policy statement of the Republic of Namibia, March 1990.1Part of the secret is that we respect confidences. We don't talk much. And we have been able to convince governments that the system works, and it is in their interest and ours that it continues to work.Peter Leyden, De Beers Senior Executive, 1981.2

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057079708708559 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:23:y:1997:i:4:p:585-613

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cjss20

DOI: 10.1080/03057079708708559

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Southern African Studies is currently edited by Ralph Smith

More articles in Journal of Southern African Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().