 Zimbabwe's Parliamentary Election of 2005: The Myth of New Electoral Laws*Norma Kriger Journal of Southern African Studies, 2008, vol. 34, issue 2, 359-378 Abstract: In the run-up to the March 2005 parliamentary election in Zimbabwe, the ruling party introduced two new electoral laws. It effectively marketed these laws as ‘new’ and ‘democratic’ to the Southern African Development Community (SADC), whose guidelines for a democratic election were the benchmark for assessing the legitimacy of the election. Rather than evaluating these laws in relation to the SADC guidelines, as most analysts and political organisations did, the article examines the new electoral laws in the context of the electoral rules which the regime had introduced ahead of the 2000 parliamentary and the 2002 presidential elections. Adopting this perspective, the article documents for the first time how the parliamentary laws largely reproduced the undemocratic electoral rules which the executive had hastily introduced ahead of the 2000 and 2002 national elections to entrench its power. The Zimbabwe case illustrates how an authoritarian regime may use the rhetoric of democratic reform to conceal its hegemonic project. Date: 2008 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:34:y:2008:i:2:p:359-378 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/03057070802038025 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Southern African Studies is currently edited by Ralph Smith More articles in Journal of Southern African Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.