Toward a rural community vitality measurement practice
Lena E. Etuk and
Alan Acock
Community Development, 2017, vol. 48, issue 1, 141-153
Abstract:
Despite the increased interest among community development practitioners and the public in indicators of concepts like community vitality, resilience, or wellbeing, little research has been done to identify indicators that truly measure those concepts. In addition, there has been increased use of indices to describe social and economic conditions. This article uses a case to illuminate the methodological challenges of developing an index of community vitality and presents a possible practice solution. Factor analysis was piloted as a method that could be used to determine if a suite of 29 variables covering community capacity, social, economic, and environmental outcomes could be used as indicators of an underlying latent construct of community vitality. Use of this method in the case of Oregon counties and Siskiyou County, California, suggested that the variables capture a variety of community outcome dimensions, but do not correspond to a unitary concept of community vitality.
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2016.1251480 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:comdev:v:48:y:2017:i:1:p:141-153
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCOD20
DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2016.1251480
Access Statistics for this article
Community Development is currently edited by John Green, Rhonda Phillips and Anne Heinze Silvis
More articles in Community Development from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().