Construction price formation: full-cost pricing or neoclassical microeconomic theory?
Martin Skitmore,
Goran Runeson and
Xinling Chang
Construction Management and Economics, 2006, vol. 24, issue 7, 773-783
Abstract:
Neo-classical microeconomic theory has been suggested to offer (1) an appropriate analytical tool for construction price determination while, at the same time, (2) full-cost pricing is most commonly accepted pricing policy of construction firms. Paradoxically, however, both are mutually exclusive theories. Only one, if any, can be correct. This paper examines both (1) and (2) by analysis of the evidence available in literature and concludes in favour of (1). It is only in disequilibrium, however, that the differences in behaviour can be clearly observed. In equilibrium, the difference between the two theories from a practical point of view is not very substantial. In addition, the endemic nature of uncertainty in the industry in general makes the task of estimating costs and prices difficult in practice. Therefore, although neoclassical microeconomic theory provides a useful means of analysis, it offers little for the practice of pricing, which is much more closely related to the marketing discipline than economics.
Keywords: Construction; contracts; pricing; theory; policy; costs; prices; neo-classical microeconomics; marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190500434849 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:7:p:773-783
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCME20
DOI: 10.1080/01446190500434849
Access Statistics for this article
Construction Management and Economics is currently edited by Will Hughes
More articles in Construction Management and Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().