Additional payments under construction contracts

John Wilson Twyford

Construction Management and Economics, 2007, vol. 25, issue 7, 739-745

Abstract: Parties to a construction contract who wish to increase the sum payable under the contract face legal problems. Such transactions are manifest in a promise by the principal or head contractor to pay more. According to traditional contract theory, a promise is not enforceable unless supported by consideration, that is, the party making the promise receives something tangible in return. The courts have attempted to define circumstances where promises that do not strictly comply with this requirement would be enforceable. The issue arose in the English Court of Appeal decision of Williams v. Roffey Bros & Nicholls; the solution, there proposed, depended on the application of subjective tests that are unworkable in the construction industry. Equally, the High Court of Australia in Walton Stores v. Maher proposed a solution that leaves the parties in doubt as to their position. The law as it presently stands is reviewed and the recommendation made that the original contract be replaced by one confirming the new price. Otherwise the consideration requirement needs to be satisfied by a new promise in exchange for the promised additional payment.

Keywords: Contracts; variations; consideration; estoppel; economic duress (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190701429804 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:7:p:739-745

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCME20

DOI: 10.1080/01446190701429804

Access Statistics for this article

Construction Management and Economics is currently edited by Will Hughes

More articles in Construction Management and Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().