International statutory adjudication: its development and impact

Robert Gaitskell

Construction Management and Economics, 2007, vol. 25, issue 7, 777-784

Abstract: This paper sets out an overview of the development of statutory adjudication, noting its origin in the UK and comparing adjudication in different jurisdictions, including Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong and South Africa. Through appraisal of the statistics of case workload referred to different dispute resolution methods, this paper considers the impact this procedure has had upon other dispute resolution processes. From the UK experience, the adoption of a statutory adjudication scheme by any jurisdiction is likely to result in significant reductions in most other forms of dispute resolution.

Keywords: Adjudication; dispute resolution; arbitration; construction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190701499609 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:7:p:777-784

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCME20

DOI: 10.1080/01446190701499609

Access Statistics for this article

Construction Management and Economics is currently edited by Will Hughes

More articles in Construction Management and Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().