Expert evidence: problems and safeguards

Alexander Nissen Qc

Construction Management and Economics, 2007, vol. 25, issue 7, 785-790

Abstract: This paper examines the role of expert evidence and expert witnesses in the resolution of construction disputes. The history of experts in court is traced through the cases, including guidelines as to the proper conduct of experts. The status and potential liability of an expert is then considered, particularly in the context of the recent Court of Appeal in Meadow v. General Medical Council [2007] 1 All ER 1. The role of an expert as advocate is considered and conclusions drawn as to the key problems which arise.

Keywords: Expert evidence; construction dispute; witness; negligence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190701499583 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:7:p:785-790

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCME20

DOI: 10.1080/01446190701499583

Access Statistics for this article

Construction Management and Economics is currently edited by Will Hughes

More articles in Construction Management and Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().