Going separate ways? The reform of health insurance funds in Germany, Japan and South Korea

Gyu-Jin Hwang

Policy Studies, 2008, vol. 29, issue 4, 421-435

Abstract: Many aspects of Japanese and Korean national health insurance systems were modelled after the German system of social insurance where non-competitive sickness funds were based on a corporatist principle. Far from converging or remaining on a corporatist path, however, each country has followed a distinctive reform trajectory in an era of globalisation: Germany choosing to grant freedom of choice between different sickness funds, Japan maintaining a multiplicity of insurance societies, and Korea merging all health insurance societies into one. This article examines the reform process underpinning health insurance funds in these three countries where significant similarities as well as differences exist. It then argues that looking into the unique institutional opportunities of the time explains how and why these governments have adopted these paths to achieve dual objectives of cost containment and social solidarity.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442870802482190 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:421-435

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cpos20

DOI: 10.1080/01442870802482190

Access Statistics for this article

Policy Studies is currently edited by Toby James

More articles in Policy Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().