Implementing health and social care policy – England and Scotland compared

Tom Forbes, Debbie Evans and Niccola Scott

Policy Studies, 2010, vol. 31, issue 6, 591-611

Abstract: This article explores the implementation of health and social care policy designed to improve partnership working between the health and social care sectors in the UK. Devolution has allowed Scotland to develop its own policies in several key areas. Given the potential for policy divergence, health and social care policy in England and Scotland is compared and contrasted. Using four partnership case studies, similar issues were apparent in both countries. Policy was dominated by the National Health Service at the expense of local authority partners and each partnership found the implementation of policy challenging, often due to inadequate policy guidance and difficult working relationships between the health and social care sectors. A key finding was that devolution had allowed Scotland more freedom to experiment with policy and the policy process became more readily influenced and challenged by local practitioners. Implications for policy implementation in similar devolved and decentralised contexts are considered.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442871003615968 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:31:y:2010:i:6:p:591-611

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cpos20

DOI: 10.1080/01442871003615968

Access Statistics for this article

Policy Studies is currently edited by Toby James

More articles in Policy Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().