Explaining infrastructure underperformance in Brazil: cash, political institutions, corruption, and policy Gestalts
Leslie Elliott Armijo and
Sybil D. Rhodes
Policy Studies, 2017, vol. 38, issue 3, 231-247
Abstract:
Brazil’s infrastructure underperforms compared to that of peer emerging economies. Why? The political institutions of coalitional presidentialism with strong federalism undermine rational national planning. Politicians’ incentives to distribute ‘pork’ combine with sector-specific oligopoly characteristics, offering fertile ground for corruption. Yet the greatest challenge is low infrastructure investment, a consequence of weak private capital markets and regulatory inconsistency. Recent center-right governments improved infrastructure service delivery without stimulating investment, while center-left governments raised investment, but undermined public finances and efficiency. Greater technocratic consensus across the partisan divide on reforms to stimulate investment is one positive consequence of Brazil’s current crisis.
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2017.1290227 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:38:y:2017:i:3:p:231-247
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cpos20
DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2017.1290227
Access Statistics for this article
Policy Studies is currently edited by Toby James
More articles in Policy Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().