Divisive ‘Commonality’: state and insecurity in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Zoe Marriage
Third World Quarterly, 2011, vol. 32, issue 10, 1891-1910
Abstract:
Northern donor policies relating to building a common future and building peaceful states and societies go to the heart of national and international security agendas. This article critiques the concept of commonality between donors and recipients and within recipient countries. It argues that the policies are problematic from the perspective of security theorising, both in their mooted ‘commonality’ and in terms of the political intervention that they imply. Historically security has been competitive and founded on compromise rather than commonality, and the internal legitimacy of states has been contested domestically, rather than ‘built’ from outside. Using the example of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the article argues that the ahistorical assumptions of these policies and the activities they license have entrenched specific forms of insecurity. There have been some returns to the donors and implementing partners but also some costs, which had not been calculated, as lessons have not been drawn from past experiences.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2011.610589 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:32:y:2011:i:10:p:1891-1910
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ctwq20
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.610589
Access Statistics for this article
Third World Quarterly is currently edited by Shahid Qadir
More articles in Third World Quarterly from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().