How can emerging powers speak? On theorists, native informants and quasi-officials in International Relations discourse
Peter Marcus Kristensen
Third World Quarterly, 2015, vol. 36, issue 4, 637-653
Abstract:
Emerging powers like China, India and Brazil are receiving growing attention as objects in International Relations (IR) discourse. Scholars from these emerging powers are rarely present as subjects in mainstream IR discourse, however. This paper interrogates the conditions for scholars in emerging powers to speak back to the mainstream discipline. It argues, first, that ‘theory speak’ is rare from scholars based in periphery countries perceived to be ‘emerging powers’. Despite increasing efforts to create a ‘home-grown’ theoretical discourse in China, India and Brazil, few articles in mainstream journals present novel theoretical frameworks or arguments framed as non-Western/Southern theory or even as a ‘Chinese school’ or ‘Brazilian concepts’. Second, scholars from emerging powers tend to speak as ‘native informants’ about their own country, not about general aspects of ‘the international’. Third, some scholars even speak as ‘quasi-officials’, that is, they speak for their country.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2015.1023288 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:36:y:2015:i:4:p:637-653
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ctwq20
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1023288
Access Statistics for this article
Third World Quarterly is currently edited by Shahid Qadir
More articles in Third World Quarterly from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().