Decision processes of a suicide bomber—the economics and psychology of attacking and defecting
Karen Pittel and
Dirk Rübbelke ()
Defence and Peace Economics, 2012, vol. 23, issue 3, 251-272
This paper provides a theoretical analysis of suicide attacks and defection. First, decision processes of potential attackers are examined from an economist’s perspective. The results are then applied to insights from behavioural economics and psychology. We derive conditions under which agents decide to become suicide bombers—or to announce an attack and defect later. Taking account of hyperbolic discounting we show why the decision to commit a suicide attack can be time-inconsistent and what internal manipulation mechanisms (arising from cognitive dissonance and terror management) and external manipulation mechanisms (employed by terrorist organizations and governments) might prevent or foster time-inconsistency.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Decision processes of a suicide bomber-the economics and psychology of attacking and defecting (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:defpea:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:251-272
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Defence and Peace Economics is currently edited by Professor Keith Hartley
More articles in Defence and Peace Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().