The timing of contests
Gilles Grandjean () and
Petros Sekeris ()
Defence and Peace Economics, 2017, vol. 28, issue 2, 137-149
We develop a simple model to analyze the timing of contests. When the odds of winning a contest are exogenously given â€“ we show that if either the players discount the future or if the total cost of contest is smaller in the future â€“ there exist subgame perfect equilibria where both players settle, anticipating a contest in the future. With endogenous efforts, the aggregate efforts expanded in a contest are smaller if the contest occurs in the future when the relative effort productivities remain constant or diverge over time, thus creating scope for delay in contests. When the effort productivities converge over time, the total efforts may be greater under a future contest. As a consequence, players either settle over the two periods, or else they initiate a contest immediately.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:defpea:v:28:y:2017:i:2:p:137-149
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Defence and Peace Economics is currently edited by Professor Keith Hartley
More articles in Defence and Peace Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().