NATO Burden Sharing Research along Three Paradigms
Marion Bogers,
Robert Beeres and
Myriame Bollen
Defence and Peace Economics, 2022, vol. 33, issue 5, 534-547
Abstract:
This paper provides both a quantitative and a qualitative review and interpretation of 153 journal papers on NATO burden sharing behaviour published over the period 1966–2020. Based on our findings, we distinguish three paradigms, reflecting the main questions and views within their particular realm of burden sharing research. Subsequently, these three paradigms study (1) the distribution of defence burdens amongst NATO member states; (2) the determinants of NATO burden sharing behaviour; and (3) how contributions to the public good of individual member states merge to determine the overall level of the good available for consumption. For each paradigm, a qualitative insight in evolving bodies of literature is offered. As it turns out, most burden sharing studies are limited to one paradigm and its ensuing main question. Future research may benefit from cross-fertilization across paradigms, longitudinal approaches and a widening of empirical foci to encompass novel threats.
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2020.1819135 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:defpea:v:33:y:2022:i:5:p:534-547
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GDPE20
DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2020.1819135
Access Statistics for this article
Defence and Peace Economics is currently edited by Professor Keith Hartley
More articles in Defence and Peace Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().