Scholarship and inventive activity in the university: complements or substitutes?
Brent Goldfarb (),
Gerald Marschke () and
Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2009, vol. 18, issue 8, 743-756
Universities are engaging in more licensing and patenting activities than ever before, and the amount of research funded by industry is increasing. Academics' commercialization activities may inhibit traditional academic scholarship. If the output of such scholarship is an important input into technological innovation and economic growth, then such an inhibition would be cause for concern. We introduce new instruments and techniques and demonstrate them using a novel panel dataset of academic electrical engineers from Stanford University. We find no evidence that engaging in inventive activity reduces the quantity of scientific output and some evidence that it increases its quality.
Keywords: science; innovation; university; commercialization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:18:y:2009:i:8:p:743-756
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Economics of Innovation and New Technology is currently edited by Professor Cristiano Antonelli
More articles in Economics of Innovation and New Technology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().