Measuring urban and rural establishment innovation in the United States

John Mann and Scott Loveridge

Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2022, vol. 31, issue 7, 650-667

Abstract: What are the best proxies for innovation and do the best proxies vary by type of region? A commonly used and easily obtained measure is patenting, but there may be disadvantages to using it exclusively. We compare patents to 39 alternative innovation measures in terms of how they perform across tradeable urban and rural establishments. Data are from the USDA’s 2014 National Survey of Business Competitiveness, a survey with nearly 11,000 respondents, with a rural region over-sample (25% of establishments responding are urban and 75% are rural). We employ a bivariate probit model using as controls a number of establishment-level characteristics for our analysis. A log likelihood ratio test confirms that urban and rural establishments should be modeled separately. While patents may provide a reasonable measure of innovative activity for urban establishments, they are more a problematic measure for rural establishments. We conclude with a brief discussion of implications and study limitations.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10438599.2020.1846248 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:650-667

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GEIN20

DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2020.1846248

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Innovation and New Technology is currently edited by Professor Cristiano Antonelli

More articles in Economics of Innovation and New Technology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().