On the need to compensate the compensating variation in CGE modeling
Ana-Isabel Guerra and
Ferran Sancho
Economic Systems Research, 2018, vol. 30, issue 3, 313-322
Abstract:
The message of this research is that in the standard calibrated setting of Computational General Equilibrium (CGE) models, the welfare measures typically used to compare benchmark with counterfactuals are numéraire dependent. This evaluation bias affects the compensating variation and the Konüs index of cost of living. We show that the equivalent variation is neutral regarding the choice of value units in calibrated models but would be affected as well in uncalibrated CGE models. We illustrate with a simple example and propose an even simpler theoretical solution to overcome these biases; all that is required to have correct welfare estimates is to compensate normalizing with a suitable price index. This type of correction is necessary to overcome the sometimes blind implementation of welfare measures in numerical general equilibrium analysis. We show that the induced quantitative errors may be substantial providing biased welfare estimates and misleading results.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2017.1372371 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:313-322
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CESR20
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2017.1372371
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Systems Research is currently edited by Bart Los and Manfred Lenzen
More articles in Economic Systems Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().