A Comparison of Partially Adaptive and Reweighted Least Squares Estimation
Brian Boyer,
James McDonald and
Whitney Newey
Econometric Reviews, 2003, vol. 22, issue 2, 115-134
Abstract:
The small sample performance of least median of squares, reweighted least squares, least squares, least absolute deviations, and three partially adaptive estimators are compared using Monte Carlo simulations. Two data problems are addressed in the paper: (1) data generated from non-normal error distributions and (2) contaminated data. Breakdown plots are used to investigate the sensitivity of partially adaptive estimators to data contamination relative to RLS. One partially adaptive estimator performs especially well when the errors are skewed, while another partially adaptive estimator and RLS perform particularly well when the errors are extremely leptokur-totic. In comparison with RLS, partially adaptive estimators are only moderately effective in resisting data contamination; however, they outperform least squares and least absolute deviation estimators.
Keywords: Least median of squares; Reweighted least squares; Partially adaptive estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/ETC-120020459 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:22:y:2003:i:2:p:115-134
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20
DOI: 10.1081/ETC-120020459
Access Statistics for this article
Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi
More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().