Estimator Choice and Fisher's Paradox: A Monte Carlo Study
Guglielmo Maria Caporale and
Nikitas Pittis ()
Econometric Reviews, 2004, vol. 23, issue 1, 25-52
Abstract:
This paper argues that Fisher's paradox can be explained away in terms of estimator choice. We analyse by means of Monte Carlo experiments the small sample properties of a large set of estimators (including virtually all available single-equation estimators), and compute the critical values based on the empirical distributions of the t-statistics, for a variety of Data Generation Processes (DGPs), allowing for structural breaks, ARCH effects etc. We show that precisely the estimators most commonly used in the literature, namely OLS, Dynamic OLS (DOLS) and non-prewhitened FMLS, have the worst performance in small samples, and produce rejections of the Fisher hypothesis. If one employs the estimators with the most desirable properties (i.e., the smallest downward bias and the minimum shift in the distribution of the associated t-statistics), or if one uses the empirical critical values, the evidence based on US data is strongly supportive of the Fisher relation, consistently with many theoretical models.
Keywords: Fisher's paradox; Cointegration; Single-equation estimators; Monte Carlo analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/ETC-120028835 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:23:y:2004:i:1:p:25-52
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20
DOI: 10.1081/ETC-120028835
Access Statistics for this article
Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi
More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().