On Testing Sample Selection Bias Under the Multicollinearity Problem
Takashi Yamagata and
Chris Orme ()
Econometric Reviews, 2005, vol. 24, issue 4, 467-481
Abstract:
This paper reviews and extends the literature on the finite sample behavior of tests for sample selection bias. Monte Carlo results show that, when the “multicollinearity problem” identified by Nawata (1993) is severe, (i) the t-test based on the Heckman-Greene variance estimator can be unreliable, (ii) the Likelihood Ratio test remains powerful, and (iii) nonnormality can be interpreted as severe sample selection bias by Maximum Likelihood methods, leading to negative Wald statistics. We also confirm previous findings (Leung and Yu, 1996) that the standard regression-based t-test (Heckman, 1979) and the asymptotically efficient Lagrange Multiplier test (Melino, 1982), are robust to nonnormality but have very little power.
Keywords: Lagrange multiplier test; Likelihood ratio test; Sample selection bias; t -test; Wald test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02770900500406132 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: On Testing Sample Selection Bias under the Multicollinearity Problem (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:24:y:2005:i:4:p:467-481
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20
DOI: 10.1080/02770900500406132
Access Statistics for this article
Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi
More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().