EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing and Improving the Performance of Nearly Efficient Unit Root Tests in Small Samples

Simon Broda, Kai Carstensen and Marc Paolella

Econometric Reviews, 2009, vol. 28, issue 5, 468-494

Abstract: The development of unit root tests continues unabated, with many recent contributions using techniques such as generalized least squares (GLS) detrending and recursive detrending to improve the power of the test. In this article, the relation between the seemingly disparate tests is demonstrated by algebraically nesting all of them as ratios of quadratic forms in normal variables. By doing so, and using the exact sampling distribution of the ratio, it is straightforward to compute, examine, and compare the test' critical values and power functions. It is shown that use of GLS detrending parameters other than those recommended in the literature can lead to substantial power improvements. The open and important question regarding the nature of the first observation is addressed. Tests with high power are proposed irrespective of the distribution of the initial observation, which should be of great use in practical applications.

Keywords: GLS detrending; Power loss; Recursive detrending (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07474930802467282 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Assessing and improving the performance of nearly efficient unit root tests in small samples (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:28:y:2009:i:5:p:468-494

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20

DOI: 10.1080/07474930802467282

Access Statistics for this article

Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi

More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:28:y:2009:i:5:p:468-494