Detrending Bootstrap Unit Root Tests
Stephan Smeekes
Econometric Reviews, 2013, vol. 32, issue 8, 869-891
Abstract:
The role of detrending in bootstrap unit root tests is investigated. When bootstrapping, detrending must not only be done for the construction of the test statistic, but also in the first step of the bootstrap algorithm. It is argued that the two issues should be treated separately. Asymptotic validity of sieve bootstrap augmented Dickey--Fuller (ADF) unit root tests is shown for test statistics based on full sample and recursive ordinary least squares (OLS) and generalized least squares (GLS) detrending. It is also shown that the detrending method in the first step of the bootstrap may differ from the one used in the construction of the test statistic. A simulation study is conducted to analyze the effects of detrending on finite sample performance of the bootstrap test. It is found that full sample OLS detrending should be preferred based on power in the first step of the bootstrap algorithm, and that the decision about the detrending method used to obtain the test statistic should be based on the power properties of the corresponding asymptotic tests.
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2012.690693 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Detrending bootstrap unit root tests (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:32:y:2013:i:8:p:869-891
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2012.690693
Access Statistics for this article
Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi
More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().