Elites and Secret Handshakes Versus Metrics and Rule-Based Acclamation: A Comment on "Measuring the Unmeasurable"

Les Oxley

Econometric Reviews, 2016, vol. 35, issue 1, 44-49

Abstract: In this issue of Econometric Reviews , Peter Phillips proposes a quantitative ( objective ) rule that might be used as part of the exercise of measuring merit. In this short comment, I will try and place the need for such a rule (lack of trust and pluralism), potential for adoption (negotiation and power), pros (transparency), and cons (metric failure and loss of institutional memory), within both an historical context and a broader strategic management literature. Ultimately, the adoption of such a rule will depend on its ability to convince the relevant community, via negotiation, that subjective assessments can be appropriately summarized numerically. Rather than argue for objectivity or suggest that numbers are somehow neutral transformations of the real world, it may be advantageous to consider some of the lessons from the critical accounting literature that has focused on the "socially constructed nature" of their numerical systems and techniques.

Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2014.956638 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:35:y:2016:i:1:p:44-49

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20

DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2014.956638

Access Statistics for this article

Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi

More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().