 A modified confidence set for the structural break date in linear regression modelsEconometric Reviews, 2018, vol. 37, issue 9, 974-999 Abstract: Elliott and Müller (EM) (2007) provide a method for constructing a confidence set for the structural break date by inverting a variant of the locally best test statistic. Previous studies have shown that the EM method produces a set with an accurate coverage ratio even for a small break; however, the set is often overly lengthy. This study proposes a simple modification to rehabilitate their method through the long-run variance estimation. Following the literature, we provide an asymptotic justification for the improvement of the modified method over the original method under a nonlocal asymptotic framework. A Monte Carlo simulation shows that the modified method achieves a shorter confidence set than the EM method, especially when the break is large or the HAC correction is conducted. The modified method may exhibit minor errors in the coverage rate when the break is small; however, the coverage is more stable than alternative methods when the break is large. We apply our method to a level shift in post-1980s Japanese inflation data. Date: 2018 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:37:y:2018:i:9:p:974-999 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2016.1178892 Access Statistics for this article Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.