Economics at your fingertips  

Heteroscedasticity testing after outlier removal

Vanessa Berenguer-Rico and Ines Wilms ()

Econometric Reviews, 2021, vol. 40, issue 1, 51-85

Abstract: Given the effect that outliers can have on regression and specification testing, a vastly used robustification strategy by practitioners consists in: (i) starting the empirical analysis with an outlier detection procedure to deselect atypical data values; then (ii) continuing the analysis with the selected non-outlying observations. The repercussions of such robustifying procedure on the asymptotic properties of subsequent inferential procedures are, however, underexplored. We study the effects of such a strategy on testing for heteroscedasticity. Specifically, using weighted and marked empirical processes of residuals theory, we show that the White test implemented after the outlier detection and removal is asymptotically chi-square if the underlying errors are symmetric. In a simulation study, we show that—depending on the type of outliers—the standard White test can be either severely undersized or oversized, as well as have trivial power. The statistic applied after deselecting outliers has good finite sample properties under symmetry but can suffer from size distortions under asymmetric errors. Given these results, we devise an empirical modeling strategy to guide practitioners whose preferred approach is to remove outliers from the sample.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2020.1735749

Access Statistics for this article

Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi

More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

Page updated 2022-04-18
Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:40:y:2021:i:1:p:51-85