Market integration, systemic risk and diagnostic tests in large mixed panels
Cindy S.H. Wang,
Cheng Hsiao and
Hao-Hsiang Yang
Econometric Reviews, 2021, vol. 40, issue 8, 750-795
Abstract:
This study investigates an AR (autoregressive)-filtered version of several conventional diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in large mixed panels when both N and T are large, including the adjusted Lagrangian Multiplier test (LM), the cross-section dependence test (CD), and the Schott test. We show that conventional tests of cross-sectional dependence based on Pearson correlation coefficients could diverge if the components are not all I(0) processes and the modified tests possess the asymptotical normality property. The distinctive feature of these new tests is their ease of implementation, even though the exact time series properties of each component of a mixed panel are unknown or unobservable in practice. Simulations show that the AR-filtered version of the CD test (CDAR) performs well relative to the other testing procedures in the finite sample and computation time, especially for those cases with a large cross-sectional dimension. Given the good statistical properties of CDAR test, we also propose to use it as an early warning indicator for market risk or crisis.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2021.1889209 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:40:y:2021:i:8:p:750-795
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2021.1889209
Access Statistics for this article
Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi
More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().