On the use of synthetic difference-in-differences approach with (-out) covariates: The case study of Brexit referendum

Esther de Brabander, Artūras Juodis and Gabriela Miyazato Szini

Econometric Reviews, 2025, vol. 44, issue 10, 1617-1646

Abstract: The synthetic control (SC) method has been a popular and dominant method for evaluating treatment and intervention effects in the last two decades. The method is powerful yet very intuitive to use for both empirical researchers and policy experts, but it is not without shortcomings. As a response to this, the new demeaned SC (DSC) and synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) approaches were introduced in the literature. Focusing on these two estimators, we evaluate the relative benefits of using DSC and SDID using in-sample placebo analysis on the real data on the Brexit referendum and an extensive Monte Carlo study. We also compare these estimators with the augmented SC (ASCM) and the matching and SC (MASC) estimators and show that while the conventional SC and matching estimators only minimize the extrapolation and the interpolation biases, respectively, the SDID estimator minimizes both biases. In our empirical study, we find that the estimated effect of the Brexit referendum on UK GDP at the end of 2018 and 2019 is higher than previously documented in the literature.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2025.2530649 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:44:y:2025:i:10:p:1617-1646

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20

DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2025.2530649

Access Statistics for this article

Econometric Reviews is currently edited by Dr. Essie Maasoumi

More articles in Econometric Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().