Big Auditors, Private Firms and Accounting Conservatism: Spanish Evidence
Manuel Cano-Rodriguez
European Accounting Review, 2010, vol. 19, issue 1, 131-159
Abstract:
This paper analyses the relationship between Big Auditors and the conditional and unconditional forms of conservatism. Drawing on a sample of Spanish firms, the current study suggests that despite small incentives for maintaining independence, Big Auditors promote conditional conservatism, thereby increasing the contracting efficiency of their clients' accounting information. The results also indicate, however, that for high levels of litigation and reputation risk, Big Auditors tend to promote unconditional conservatism, which can reduce the quality of financial reports. On this basis, I conclude that in the absence of essential litigation and reputation risk, Big Auditors typically provide higher quality audits than non-Big Auditors do. This differentiation may become subtler with litigation and reputation risk, however, because Big Auditors become overly conservative.
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638180902989426 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:euract:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:131-159
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20
DOI: 10.1080/09638180902989426
Access Statistics for this article
European Accounting Review is currently edited by Laurence van Lent
More articles in European Accounting Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst (chris.longhurst@tandf.co.uk).