Value Relevance of Accounting Information for Intangible-Intensive Industries and the Impact of Scale: The US Evidence

Mustafa Ciftci, Masako Darrough and Raj Mashruwala

European Accounting Review, 2014, vol. 23, issue 2, 199-226

Abstract: The structural shift in the USA from a tangible- to an intangible-intensive economy raises a concern that reporting based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) might have lost its usefulness to investors. Amir and Lev [(1996) Value relevance of nonfinancial information: the wireless communications industry, Journal of Accounting and Economics , 22(1-3), pp. 3-30] argue that accounting information is not useful for intangible-intensive firms. In contrast, Collins et al . [(1997) Changes in the value relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years, Journal of Accounting and Economics , 24(1), pp. 39-67] find that the value relevance (measured by R -squared) of accounting information has increased over time and that value relevance for intangible-intensive industries is as high as that for tangible-intensive industries. In this article, we attempt to resolve the above discrepancy by examining the impact of scale on R -squared (Brown, S., Lo, K. and Lys, T. (1999) Use of R -super-2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades, Journal of Accounting and Economics , 28(2), pp. 83-115). We find that, after controlling for scale, R -squared is lower for intangible-intensive industries than for non-intangible-intensive industries and has declined over time for intangible-intensive industries but remained stable for non-intangible-intensive industries. Interestingly, the declining trend ended with the demise of the 'New Economy' period (NEP) (Core, J. E., Guay, W. R. and Van Buskirk, A. (2003) Market valuations in the New Economy: an investigation of what has changed, Journal of Accounting and Economics , 34(2-3), pp. 43-67), and value relevance for both industry groups appears to be restored in the post-NEP to the pre-NEP level. We also find that R&D capitalisation increases value relevance for intangible-intensive industries, but does not completely eliminate the gap between the two groups.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2013.815124 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:euract:v:23:y:2014:i:2:p:199-226

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20

DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2013.815124

Access Statistics for this article

European Accounting Review is currently edited by Laurence van Lent

More articles in European Accounting Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().