The Effect of Strategy on the Asymmetric Cost Behavior of SG&A Expenses

Apostolos Ballas, Vasilios-Christos Naoum and Orestes Vlismas

European Accounting Review, 2022, vol. 31, issue 2, 409-447

Abstract: Asymmetric cost behavior has been attributed to deliberate managerial resource commitment decisions and a firm’s strategic choices is a significant determinant of these decisions. This study investigates the effect of strategy on the intensity and direction of the asymmetric cost behavior of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses. Employing a sample of US-listed firms for the period 1991–2014, we provide empirical evidence that a firm’s strategic orientation determines the direction and intensity of cost asymmetry. Firms classified as prospectors exhibit SG&A cost stickiness whereas firms classified as defenders exhibit SG&A cost anti-stickiness. Sensitivity and causality tests indicate that a firm’s strategic positioning and its portfolio of intangible re-sources independently affect the resource allocation decisions that are responsible for the direction of cost asymmetry for the SG&A expenses.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2020.1813601 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:euract:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:409-447

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20

DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2020.1813601

Access Statistics for this article

European Accounting Review is currently edited by Laurence van Lent

More articles in European Accounting Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().